FROM STATE OWNERSHIP TO MODERN CORPORATIONS: ANALYSIS OF REGULATIONS AND PRINCIPLES OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE IN BALANCING DEVELOPMENT FUNCTIONS AND PROFITABILITY IN THE ERA OF ECONOMIC GLOBALISATION
Keywords:
SOEs, regulation, corporate governance, good corporate governance, dual mandate, national development, profitability, economic globalisationAbstract
This article analyses the transformation of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) from bureaucratic state-owned entities into professional and competitive modern corporations in the era of economic globalisation. The main focus of the study is on the regulations governing the status and role of SOEs, particularly Law No. 19 of 2003 and its amendments, as well as the application of good corporate governance principles in maintaining a balance between national development functions and profit generation. The analysis shows that the separation of functions between the government as owner and SOEs as operators, the professionalisation of management, and the strengthening of supervisory mechanisms are key to overcoming the tensions caused by the dual mandate of SOEs. However, political challenges, policy intervention, and social obligations that are not managed transparently still hinder performance optimisation. This article concludes that SOEs can function as modern state corporations based on public values if regulations, governance, and organisational culture are designed synergistically to maintain a balance between public and market interests.
Downloads
References
Az-Zahran, M. H., Syahfiraputri, N. N., & Pahlevi, R. S. (2023). Menuju Ekonomi Hijau: Strategi BUMD dan BUMN dalam Mengurangi Jejak Lingkungan. Manifesto, 1(1). https://manifestobrawijaya.ub.ac.id/index.php/manifesto/article/view/19
Belloc, F. (2014). Innovation in State-Owned Enterprises: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(3), 821–848. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480311
Böwer, U. (2017). State-Owned Enterprises in Emerging Europe: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. International Monetary Fund.
Disemadi, H. S., & Wahyuni, R. A. E. (2019). EKSISTENSI DAN KEBIJAKAN REGULASI PERIZINAN LEMBAGA KEUANGAN MIKRO OLEH OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN. Jurnal Yustisiabel, 3(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.32529/yustisiabel.v3i2.384
Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.
Jin, X., Yu, J., Yuan, G., & Zang, R. (2025). Impact of State-Owned Equity Participation on the Risk-Taking Capacity of Private Enterprises in China: Insights From a Quasinatural Experiment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 33(4), 629–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12619
Kesumah, H. F. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Good Corporate Governance (GCG) (Kasus Pada PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia (persero)). Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Industry (JEMI), 4(3), 91. https://doi.org/10.36782/jemi.v4i3.2229
Kirana, A. R., & Wijaya, K. A. S. (2026). REFORMASI KELEMBAGAAN PENGELOLAAN BUMN MELALUI PEMBENTUKAN BP BUMN: ANALISIS PEMISAHAN PERAN REGULATOR DAN OPERATOR DALAM PERSPEKTIF TATA KELOLA. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62281/4fj3xt95
Melo, I. J. (2025). Prinsip Tata Kelola dan Perubahan Paradigma BUMN UU 1/2025. Netizen Journal, 4(1), 78–95.
Novitasari, R., Sholihah, Q., & Prasetyo, K. (2025). The Role of Policy Entrepreneurs in Encouraging Partnership and Strengthening MSME Supply Chains in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 17(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.17.2025.121-141
Orchad, C. (2016). PENERAPAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DALAM UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN BUMN YANG BERBUDAYA. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 11(2), 259–271.
Patten, M. L. (2016). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials (9th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266312
RAHMAT FERI PONTOH, J. RONALD MAWUNTU, DANI R. PINASANG, & DONNA O. SETIABUDHI. (2023). SYNCHRONIZATION, HARMONIZATION AND FACILITATION: INSTITUTIONAL LINKAGES AND LEGISLATIVE IN DRAFTING OF REGIONAL REGULATIONS. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8285918
Rentsch, C., & Finger, M. (2015). YES, NO, MAYBE: THE AMBIGUOUS RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN STATE‐OWNED ENTERPRISES AND THE STATE. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12096
Rorong, I. P. (2008). PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA (BUMN) DI INDONESIA. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiae.2008.002.02.4
Simbolon, H. A. (2026). DANANTARA Strategi Mewujudkan Ketahanan Ekonomi Indonesia. Detak Pustaka.
Sukayasa, I. N. (2025). Peran regulasi hukum bisnis dalam mendorong kepatuhan usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah (UMKM): Review jurnal sistematis. Journal of Economics Research and Policy Studies, 5(2), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.53088/jerps.v5i2.2078
Tihanyi, L., Aguilera, R. V., Heugens, P., van Essen, M., Sauerwald, S., Duran, P., & Turturea, R. (2019). State Ownership and Political Connections. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2293–2321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318822113
Yulianti, D. (2015). RESTRUKTURISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA (BUMN) SEBAGAI SALAH SATU LANGKAH REFORMASI UNTUK MENGEMBANGKAN PERUSAHAAN: STUDI PADA PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA VII (PERSERO) LAMPUNG. SOSIOLOGI: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Budaya, 17(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.23960/sosiologi.v17i2.79
Evolusi regulasi: dari UU No. 19 Tahun 2003 hingga kebijakan turunan terbaru.
Kementerian BUMN. (2021). Buku saku tata kelola BUMN. Jakarta: Kementerian BUMN.
OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing.
World Bank. (2019). Public enterprise reform and corporate governance. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
