BEHAVIORAL FACTORS INFLUENCING AUDITOR JUDGMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR AUDITS

Authors

  • Andi Nurrahma Gaffar Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia Author
  • Amiruddin Amiruddin Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia Author
  • Rahmawati HS Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20520073

Keywords:

Behavioral Factors, Auditor Judgment, Public Sector, Cognitive Bias, Auditor Ethics, Independence

Abstract

This study aims to analyze behavioral factors that influence auditor judgment in public sector audits through a literature review approach. Auditor judgment is a crucial element in the audit process because it determines the quality of findings, recommendations, and the reliability of audit reports. In the context of the public sector, which is rife with political pressure, accountability demands, and regulatory complexity, behavioral factors are becoming increasingly dominant in shaping auditors' professional decisions. This study integrates findings from various academic literature and relevant empirical research to identify key variables such as cognitive bias, time pressure, auditor experience, professional ethics, independence, and the influence of the organizational environment on auditor judgment. The results indicate that cognitive biases such as overconfidence and anchoring can reduce auditor objectivity in evaluating audit evidence. In addition, time pressure and high workloads tend to encourage auditors to make heuristic decisions, potentially reducing the quality of judgment. On the other hand, auditor experience and competence have been shown to improve the quality of professional judgment, especially in complex audit situations. Ethical and independence factors are also important determinants in maintaining the integrity of auditor judgment, especially in a public sector environment that is vulnerable to external intervention. This study confirms that improving the quality of auditor judgment depends not only on technical aspects but also requires strengthening behavioral aspects through training, an ethical organizational culture, and an effective internal control system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Natour, A. R., Al-Qadi, N. S., Meqbel, R., Zaidan, H., Al-Mawali, H., & Al-Okaily, M. (2023). The Role of Privatisation in Sustaining Auditor Independence: Evidence from the Developing Markets. Sustainability, 15(8), 6350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086350

Alqaraleh, M. H., & Oudat, M. S. (2022). The Mediating Role of Organizational Culture on the Relationship Between Information Technology and Internal Audit Effectiveness (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5147120). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p1

Alqudah, H., Amran, N. A., Hassan, H., Lutfi, A., Alessa, N., Alrawad, M., & Almaiah, M. A. (2023). Examining the critical factors of internal audit effectiveness from internal auditors’ perspective: Moderating role of extrinsic rewards. Heliyon, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20497

Astuti, C. D., Sihotang, E. P., Wahyuni, L., & Dizar, S. (2022). The Effect Determinant Factors of Audit Judgment in the Government Sector. 778–782. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_131

Awuah, B., Onumah, J. M., & Duho, K. C. T. (2022). Determinants of adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques among internal audit units in Ghana. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 88(2), e12203. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12203

Eklöv Alander, G. (2023). Internal auditor independence as a situated practice: Four archetypes. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(9), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4137

Goto, M. (2023). Anticipatory innovation of professional services: The case of auditing and artificial intelligence. Research Policy, 52(8), 104828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104828

Hanum, Z., Rahmadana, M. F., & Nasution, M. A. P. E. (2024). The Impact of Auditor Competence and Auditor Experience on Audit Judgement, Mediated by Task Complexity, within Public Accounting Firms in the City of Medan. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e1925–e1925. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.1925

Hegazy, M. A. A., & Salama, S. (2022). Effects of qualitative factors and auditors’ personal characteristics on materiality judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(3), 305–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2019-2379

Kordab, M., Raudeliuniene, J., & Nedelko, Z. (2026). Organizational factors affecting knowledge processes: Evidence from the auditing and consulting sector. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2024-0433

Loke, C. H., Ismail, S., & Fatima, A. H. (2022). Ethical work climate and its influence on work-related ethical behaviour among the Malaysian public sector auditors. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(4), 720–741. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2021-0194

Merdekawati, E. (2022). The Effect of Audit Experience and Audit Risk on Audit Judgment with Auditor’s Perceptions of the Code of Ethics of Public Accountants as Moderating Variables. E3S Web of Conferences, 348, 00004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234800004

Moustafa Abdallah, B. A., Ghanem, M. G., & Hijazi, W. H. (2024). Analyzing the Factors That Affect Auditor’s Judgment and Decision Making in Lebanese Audit Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17020073

Mustika, L. (2023). The Influence of Competence and Experience of Auditors on Audit Outcomes. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 3(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v3i2.380

Ramadhan, F., Indriani, R., & Fachruzzaman, F. (2024). The Influence Of Competence, Independence, Obedience Pressure, And Internal Control System On The Quality Of Internal Auditor Examination Results. EKOMBIS REVIEW: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 12(1), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v12i1.5300

Samiolo, R., Spence, C., & Toh, D. (2024). Auditor judgment in the fourth industrial revolution. Contemporary Accounting Research, 41(1), 498–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12901

Setiawan, N., Rohemah, R., & Aulia, I. F. (2023). Independence for Internal Auditors: Is it Necessary? Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 10(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.55963/jraa.v10i2.542

Shamsadini, K., Javanmard, H., & Morady, Z. (2024). Qualitative modeling of factors affecting auditor’s judgment and decision-making. Accounting Research Journal, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-11-2023-0330

Sitorus, P. P., & Batu, B. M. P. L. (2025). The Effect of Obedience Pressure and Auditor Competence on Audit Judgment with Task Complexity as a Moderating Variable. Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 1(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.65440/nh47vh43

Sukiswo, H. W., & Rachman, H. A. (2023). Analysis of Behavioral Factors Influence The Audit Judgment. Journal of Economics, Business, and Government Challenges, 6(02), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.33005/ebgc.v6i2.362

Ta, T. T., & Doan, T. N. (2022). Factors Affecting Internal Audit Effectiveness: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10020037

Vu, D. A., & Hung, N. X. (2023). Factors Influencing the Auditor Independence and Affects to Audit Quality of Supreme Audit Institution of Vietnam. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof.Bus. Rev., 8(5), 131.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-02