MAPPING THE CONCEPT OF TAX RESPONSIBILITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ETHICAL, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES

Authors

  • Afriana Lomagio Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo Utara Author
  • Ismi Ayu Lestari Universitas Hasanuddin Author
  • Amiruddin Universitas Hasanuddin Author
  • Asri Usman Universitas Hasanuddin Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23100921

Keywords:

Tax Responsibility, Tax Ethics, Tax Morale, Social Norms, Tax Culture, Voluntary Tax Compliance.

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to map and synthesize the concept of tax responsibility by integrating ethical, social, and cultural perspectives, and to develop a comprehensive conceptual framework that explains responsible tax behavior. Design/methodology/approach – This study employs a systematic library research approach using literature retrieved primarily from the Scopus database. Relevant studies on tax responsibility, tax ethics, tax morale, social norms, fairness, institutional trust, tax culture, cultural values, and voluntary tax compliance were identified, classified, and synthesized through thematic coding, concept mapping, and conceptual synthesis. Findings – The findings reveal that tax responsibility extends beyond formal tax compliance and represents a multidimensional construct shaped by ethical values, social relationships, and cultural contexts. Ethical tax responsibility reflects moral obligation and ethical awareness; social tax responsibility emphasizes social norms, fairness, reciprocity, and institutional trust; while cultural tax responsibility captures collective values and tax culture. The synthesis proposes an Integrated Tax Responsibility (ITR) framework following the pathway: Cultural Values → Social Norms → Ethical Tax Awareness → Integrated Tax Responsibility → Voluntary Tax Compliance. Originality/value – This study advances taxation literature by repositioning tax responsibility as an integrative concept linking cultural, social, and ethical mechanisms with voluntary tax compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alm, J., & McClellan, C. (2012). Tax morale and tax compliance from the firm’s perspective. Kyklos, 65(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2011.00524.x

Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.09.002

Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Savoia, A. (2012). Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.003

Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.010

Daude, C., Gutiérrez, H., & Melguizo, Á. (2012). What drives tax morale? OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 315. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8zk8m61kzq-en

Fonseca Corona, F. J. (2024). Tax morale: A global scoping review from the cultural approach to economics. International Economics and Economic Policy, 21, 127–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-023-00579-8

Frey, B. S., & Torgler, B. (2007). Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.006

Horodnic, I. A. (2018). Tax morale and institutional theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(9/10), 868–886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2018-0039

Jimenez, P., & Iyer, G. S. (2016). Tax compliance in a social setting: The influence of social norms, trust in government, and perceived fairness on taxpayer compliance. Advances in Accounting, 34, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.07.001

Kountouris, Y., & Remoundou, K. (2013). Is there a cultural component in tax morale? Evidence from immigrants in Europe. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 96, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.09.010

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Tax morale: What drives people and businesses to pay tax? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f3d8ea10-en

Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717

Robbins, B. G., & Kiser, E. (2020). State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion. Social Science Research, 91, 102448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102448

Scarpa, F., & Signori, S. (2023). Understanding corporate tax responsibility: A systematic literature review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(7), 179–201.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.

Wenzel, M. (2004). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00168-X

Wenzel, M. (2005). Motivation or rationalisation? Causal relations between ethics, norms and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.03.003

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02