PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PELANGGARAN ETIKA PROFESI MELALUI MAJELIS KEHORMATAN ETIKA KEDOKTERAN (MKEK): KAJIAN PUSTAKA TENTANG MEKANISME DAN EFEKTIVITASNYA

Authors

  • Hotmaria Hertawaty Sijabat Doctoral Student Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta Author

Keywords:

Medical Ethics Council, dispute resolution, professional ethics violations, mechanisms, effectiveness, medical code of ethics, patient protection

Abstract

This study examines the mechanisms and effectiveness of resolving professional ethics violations through the Medical Ethics Council (MKEK) using a literature review approach. The MKEK acts as an institution tasked with maintaining the integrity of the medical profession and protecting patients' rights through the fair and transparent resolution of code of ethics violations. This study examines the dispute resolution procedure, starting from the complaint, verification, examination, plenary session, to the imposition of sanctions and evaluation of the effectiveness of the process in providing protection and corrective impact. The results of the study show that although the MKEK has implemented a structured resolution mechanism, there are several challenges that affect its effectiveness, such as the sometimes lengthy resolution process, variations in the imposition of sanctions, and limited resources. This study recommends improving human resource capacity, greater transparency, and the use of information technology to strengthen the role of the MKEK as a credible ethical dispute resolution body. Thus, the MKEK can be more effective in building medical professionalism and maintaining public trust in the health care system in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Christian, A. (2025). Peran Etika dan Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(1).

Dewi, S. (2022). Kronologi Kisruh Terawan Versi Eks Ketum IDI Ilham Oetama. IDN Times Online.

Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.

Gunardi. (2021). Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Etik Kedokteran (MKEK) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Etik Profesi Kedokteran. PSERINA Journal.

Gunawan, I. (2024). Medical Ethics in Indonesia: Case Review. Journal of Social Justice and Urban Nursing.

Handayani, N. A. C. (2022). 5 Jejak Konflik Dokter Terawan dengan IDI, Berujung Diberhentikan Secara Resmi. Suara.Com.

Hartanto, N. (2018). Criminal Violations of the Medical Ethics Code by Dr. Bimanesh. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no4.1378

Hasnati, B. & Bahrun. (2015). Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Lex Crimen Journal, 4(3).

Hemestiana Matilda Sun & Hudi Yusuf. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kelalaian Medik Melalui Mediasi dan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI). Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9).

Indrawan, K. (2024). Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Dugaan Pelanggaran Disiplin Kedokteran. Justicia Sains.

Kastania Lintang. (2021). Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5267

Kastury, A. H. (2024). Kedudukan Lembaga Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia Dalam Prespektif Hukum. Vifada Assumption Journal of Law, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.70184/vh8xwy88

Kurniawati, S. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia. Innovative Journal.

Linu, N. B. S., Tampanguma, M. Y., & Waha, C. J. J. (2025). Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Penanganan Sengketa Medis. Lex Privatum Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, 15(2).

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., & Bossuyt, P. M. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pelafu, J. (2015). Majelis Kehormatan Etika Kedokteran sebagai Lembaga Penegak Etika Profesi. E-Journal UNSRAT.

Prawiroharjo, P., Budiningsih, Y., & Rozaliyani, A. (2018). Dapatkah Keputusan Kemahkamahan Etik Majelis Kehormatan Etik Kedokteran Bersifat Terbuka? Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 2(2), 45–52.

Rufaida, A., & Yusuf, H. (2025). Peran IDI dalam Pengawasan Etika Profesi Kedokteran di Indonesia. JIIC, 2(1).

Septian Andreas Christian. (2025). Peran Etika dan Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(1).

Sinaga, N. A. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Diplomasi.

Siregar, R. A. (2025). Transformasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis.

Sukohar, A. (2016). Peran Majelis Kehormatan Etik Kedokteran Indonesia (MKEK) dalam Penyelesaian Malpraktek. Jurnal PEPKI, 1(2).

Wahyu Andrianto S. H. M. H. (2015). Secarik Catatan untuk Majelis Disiplin Dokter.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-09

Issue

Section

Articles