ANALISIS MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEDIS ANTARA PASIEN DAN TENAGA KESEHATAN: PERBANDINGAN JALUR PROFESI DAN JALUR PENGADILAN
Keywords:
medical disputes, professional channels, court channels, rights protection, restorative justiceAbstract
This study aims to analyse the mechanism of medical dispute resolution between patients and health professionals in Indonesia by comparing professional and judicial channels through a normative legal literature review approach. The analysis reveals that the professional route, such as through the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honour Council (MKDKI) and other non-litigious resolution mechanisms, is more consultative, faster, administrative in nature, and maintains confidentiality for all parties, but remains limited in terms of compensation for patients. Conversely, the court system offers litigation mechanisms with final and binding decisions and the potential for compensation for patients, but carries risks of high costs, lengthy processes, and psychological impacts on both patients and healthcare workers. Both contribute to protecting the rights of patients and healthcare workers, but further regulatory strengthening and synergy between the two mechanisms are needed to achieve more fair, effective, and restorative justice-oriented resolution of medical disputes in Indonesia.
References
Alfian, A. (2024). Legal Efforts Undertaken by Patients in Medical Disputes. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM, 14(1).
Anjani, R. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Berdasarkan Perspektif Tenaga Medis dan Pasien. JIIC Nusantara, 2(2).
Arista, N. (2024). Arbitration in Healthcare Service Disputes. Jurnal Yustisia, 13(1).
Aulia, H., & Yusuf, H. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Atas Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien dan Dokter Terkait Dugaan Malpraktik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(1), 1101–1111.
Boboy, J. T. B., Santoso, B., & Irawati, I. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi Berdasarkan Teori Dean G. Pruitt dan Jeffrey Z. Rubin. Notarius, 13(2), 803–818.
Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.
Fadilah, A. (2024). Transformasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis: Sebuah Paradigma Baru dalam Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 11(1), 52–64.
Fassa, F., Asmiyanti, S., & SH, M. K. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Das Sollen & Das Sein. Podomoro University Press.
Firmansyah, B. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik melalui Mediasi oleh MKDKI. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 12(2).
Fitria, N. (2024). Implementation of the Ultimum Remedium Principle in Resolving Medical Disputes. Delegalata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(1).
Handayani, E. Y., Shamer, C., & Triana, Y. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dokter Terhadap Surat Izin Praktik Pada Rumah Sakit. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(6), 3148–3161.
Harahap, Y., & Kartika, N. (2024). Standar Profesionalisme Dokter dan Hak Pasien dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik. Jurnal Retentum, 7(2).
Hartati, D., & Pratama, B. (2025). Paradigma Baru Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Indonesia. Jurnal Retentum, 7(1), 205–215.
Hartono, B. (2024). Mediasi Sebagai Asas Primum Remedium Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Jurnal Etika Kesehatan, 5(1).
Hendra, M. J., & Nefri, J. E. (2024). Mediasi dan Arbitrase. Hutanasyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 2(2), 83–94.
Hidayat, M. D. (2024). Initiating the Establishment of an Alternative Medical Dispute Resolution. Justisia Journal, 2(3).
Husna, I., & Hidayat, R. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Melalui Badan Alternatif. Jurnal Hukum Sehat, 5(3).
Kurniawan, A. (2023). Advantages and Disadvantages of Restorative Justice Approach in Medical Dispute Resolution. Progressive Law Review, 5(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.36448/plr.v5i02.113
Kusuma, D. (2024). Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik. Kertha Semaya, 12(1).
Larissa, A. D. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung.
Madjid, H., & Zakaria, S. (2023). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Medical Malpractice Cases. Journal of Law and Public Policy, 3(1).
Maulida, L., & Rafi, D. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kesehatan atas Dugaan Malpraktik Medis. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(2).
Muhlis, S. R., Nambung, I., & Alwy, S. (2020). Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Pasien dengan Rumah Sakit Melalui Jalur Mediasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 5(1), 31–40.
Pohan, T. R. (2025). Settlement of Medical Disputes After Law No. 17 of 2023 Concerning Health. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6(2), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i2.371
Rusdi, A. M. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum dalam Menangani Kasus Sengketa Medis antara Tenaga Medis pada Sistem Peradilan. Journal of Comprehensive Science, 4(3).
Saputra, R. (2022). Implementasi Mediasi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Bulukumba. Universitas Muslim Indonesia.
Sari, D., & Hidayat, A. (2024). Relevansi Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Luar Pengadilan. Kertha Semaya, 12(2).
Shamara, D. (2025). Grievance Mechanism and Legal Dispute Resolution for Medical Personnel and Patients. SINOMICS Journal, 4(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v4i1.473
Sularso, B., & Wahyuni, R. (2022). Etikomedicolegal Aspects of the COVID-19 Health Services in Preparing Regulations and Intermediaries for Clinical Dispute Resolution. Medical Journal of Indonesia, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.225718
Syaroni & Widyaningrum. (2024). Peningkatan Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara Melalui Pendekatan Alternatif. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(1), 80–92.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 209–222.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. (2023).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran. (2004).
Yunus, F. (2025). Legal Protection of Patients in Medical Practices. Hasanuddin Law Review, 11(2).
