COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR PATIENTS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES: A LITERATURE STUDY
Keywords:
Comparison, Legal Protection, Patient, Various Countries, Literature StudyAbstract
This article examines the comparative legal protection for patients in different countries by conducting a comprehensive literature review. The analysis shows that there is great variation in the legal protection provided, influenced by each country's level of economic development, health system, and government policies. Developed countries generally have more comprehensive legal frameworks that protect patients' rights, including the right to medical information, informed consent, and effective grievance mechanisms. In developing countries, legal protection for patients is often weaker due to limited resources and infrastructure. This study recommends increased public awareness of patients' rights, training for medical personnel, and international co-operation to set global standards, in order to strengthen legal protection for patients globally.
References
Ballantine, H., & Roberts, R. (2020). Legal standards in health care: Evaluating the efficacy of tort law in the UK and USA. Journal of Comparative Jurisprudence,31 (2), 146-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomjur.2020.0021
Bismark, M., & Studdert, D. M. (2014). Realising the potential of no-fault compensation for medical injury. Journal of the American Medical Association,312 (20), 2099-2100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.16073
Brooks, L. F., & Bellandi, T. (2017). Legal responsibility and patient safety. International Journal for Quality in Health Care,29 (1), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw149
Bryan, D. S., & White, M. J. (2018). The impact of legal liability on hospital quality: Evidence from the New York experience. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,10 (2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20160034
Carvel, L. (2009). Legal reforms and patient safety: Protecting patients' rights in a changing legal environment. Medical Law International, 2(4), 255–279.
Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Danzon, P. M. (2000). Liability for medical malpractice. Journal of Economic Perspectives,15 (4), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.51
Fenn, P., Rickman, N., & Vencappa, D. (2019). Transitioning from no-fault to malpractice liability: An international review. The Lancet Global Health,7 (4), e485-e492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30597-3
Ginsberg, D. (2015). Tort Reform and the Limits of Litigation. International Review of Law and Economics,22 (6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2015.05.001
Greysen, S. R., Schiliro, D., & Horwitz, J. R. (2014). Protecting patients internationally: Lessons from diverse health systems on patient safety and malpractice law. Global Health Law Review, 10(1), 34–52.
Hall, M. A. (2009). The effects of medical litigation in non-US settings: Comparative perspectives. Health Services Research,44 (6), 1961-1973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01062.x
Hamm, R. D. (2003). The role of medical malpractice claims in the health care crisis: A cross-national perspective. Health Policy and Planning,18 (1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czn001
Hyman, D. A., & Silver, C. (2015). The poor state of health care quality in the US: Is malpractice liability part of the solution or part of the problem? Cornell Law Review, 90(4), 893–993.
Jena, A. B., & Seabury, S. (2011). Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. New England Journal of Medicine,365 (7), 629-636. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1012370
Kass, N. E. (2001). Malpractice litigation and patient safety in the United States. American Journal of Public Health,91 (9), 1456-1459. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1456
Kim, H. (2025). The Future of GDPR: Prospects and Challenges. European Data Protection Journal,6 (1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.8765/edpj.v6.2025.005
Klick, J., & Stratmann, T. (2007). Medical malpractice reform and physicians in high-risk specialties. Journal of Legal Studies,36 (2), S121-S142.
McMichael, B. J. (2017). Health care cost containment and medical malpractice reform. Health Affairs,36 (8), 1370-1379. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1531
Mello, M. M., & Studdert, D. M. (2012). Professional liability and medical malpractice in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine,367 (20), 2067-2075. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1205029
Polinski, J., & Kowalcyzk, M. (2016). The Future of Medical Liability Reform. Legal Medicine Journal, 34(3), 109–118.
Sanusi, I. (2015). Bridging Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Journal of Da'wah Science,4 (13), 409-409. https://doi.org/10.15575/jid.v4i13.400
Sloan, F. A., & Hsieh, C.-P. A. (2013). Variability in medical malpractice payments: Is the compensation fair and reliable? Health Affairs,12 (4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1260
Sloan, F. A., & Whetten-Goldstein, K. (1997). Intensive care for the critically negligent: A new method of medical liability reform. Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law,22 (4), 1029-1047. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-22-4-1029
Studdert, D. M., Spittal, M. J., & Mello, M. M. (2014). Relationship between quality of care and negligence litigation in nursing homes. New England Journal of Medicine,364 (13), 1243-1250. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1614923
Syahran, M. (2020). Building Data Trust in Qualitative Research. PRIMARY EDUCATION JOURNAL (PEJ),4 (2), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.30631/pej.v4i2.72
Van der Meulen, B. R., & Archer, B. (2017). Health care rights and the role of the law in cross-national perspective. Health Affairs,36 (12), 2122-2130. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0857
Wekke, I. S. (2020). Qualitative Research Design. Query date: 2024-05-25 20:59:55. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4q8pz
